Home News What's On Annual Poll Photos Forums DJs Features Music Venues Reviews Links

HarderFaster Forums >> General Mayhem >> Should dealers have a "duty of care"? Author Pages (5):  1  2  3  4  [5]      Quin. ??? Registered: Oct 2010 Posts: 33316 - Threads: 426 Location: london Quote: Matt wrote on 01-09-2016 09:52 AM Quote: danj wrote on 23-08-2016 12:49 AM I thought any respectable person willing to deal with that sort of profession would adhere to those kind of respects when dealing with people. Personally, I could never deal with the hassle. I think the most important thing is if you can't afford something you shouldn't be doing it and no-one should be facilitating it either, the same goes for credit card companies, banks, store cards etc. The difference is that credit card companies, banks, store cards et al are regulated, supposedly to avoid people running up debts they can't afford. That's another potential benefit of legislation. And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those that could not hear the music -Nietzsche Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 01-09-2016 09:55 AM voodoobass a table, mes enfants... Registered: Sep 2003 Posts: 33900 - Threads: 985 Location: somewhere else Well, the entire question is an answer to why drugs should be legalised. Clandestine dealers range from social contacts and friends who are generally concerned about the well-being of their clients, but also only sell quality product that they would be happy to use themselves, to street dealers who prefer to sell highly addictive substances and are purely in it to make as much quick money as possible. Obviously no vendor wants to see a valuable revenue stream cut off by inconvenient death but then at the street level it's not always immediately apparent if the drugs were the cause of death or only implied in it. soundcloud.com/voodoobass mixcloud.com/voodoobass Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 01-09-2016 23:34 PM Donnie-B Registered: May 2012 Posts: 4133 - Threads: 366 Location: London yes. purely because somebody OD'ing could get me caught. Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 13-09-2016 08:49 AM Quin. ??? Registered: Oct 2010 Posts: 33316 - Threads: 426 Location: london Quote: louloubell wrote on 01-09-2016 09:49 AM Quote: teklondon wrote on 31-08-2016 09:49 PM Looks like we are dealing with a bunch of teenagers. Get your tongue out of her arse little boy. How did we get onto the subject of rimming? and little boys. Rapeyside. And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those that could not hear the music -Nietzsche Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 13-09-2016 10:38 AM danj there is no spoon Registered: Mar 2005 Posts: 18374 - Threads: 785 Location: Omnipresent Quote: teklondon wrote on 20-08-2016 12:25 AM Quote: ceekay wrote on 19-08-2016 03:50 PM If you were a dealer and you saw one of your clients slide and fall into addiction, would you just keep feeding their habit knowing it would kill them, or would you try and intervene. Not fully intervene but at least say something about how it might be time to knock it on the head and not sell for a while? Is this a wind up? Act your age you f*****g t**t. wat (¬_/) (='.'=) (")_(") HF2 - coming soon! Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 13-09-2016 11:42 AM danj there is no spoon Registered: Mar 2005 Posts: 18374 - Threads: 785 Location: Omnipresent Quote: 5709 wrote on 23-08-2016 03:31 PM Quote: GMReq. wrote on 23-08-2016 03:23 PM No I do not think so. Personal responsibility is the essence of being alive. People take their own lives into their own hands when they take drugs. It is their risk and if they fall short they have no one to blame but themselves. That said, new designer drugs or "legal highs" have been tested far less times dose-wise than all the newer drugs thus making them more dangerous due to unknown interactions or side effects. The governments policy on banning new drugs and thus encouraging new unknown comopounds sits at the heart of the risk. Futhermore blaming venues like Fabric for people dying is utterly rediculous. People cannot be shielded from their own decision making. Listen, clubs run on drug taking, they know that. No drugs, s**t night, and nobody will come back. Every sensible person who knows the scene knows that. Yes, it's a tough one. How to appease the law whilst still making a good night. And the law knows that too. That's why you saw no police, bar a token turn up, at hard house events. Pill takers are no trouble. They were there, you just didn't see them. (¬_/) (='.'=) (")_(") HF2 - coming soon! Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged 13-09-2016 11:46 AM All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44:50         Pages (5):  1  2  3  4  [5]      Forum Jump: Please select one: -------------------- Search Home -------------------- -- Recent messages -- Welcome to HarderFaster -- Lighthearted Banter -- Serious Discussions -- Upcoming Events and Adverts -- How good a night was THAT ? -- HarderFaster Lifestyle -- Mad Hatter's Corner -- General Mayhem -- HarderFaster Active -- The Asylum -- Mixes and Feedback -- Tunes and Tracks -- DJing -- Production Studio -- Production Feedback -- Photos and Photography -- Community Notices -- F.A.O. -- Classic Threads -- HarderFaster: announcements, suggestions and feedback -- Area 51 Forum Rules: You may post new threads You may post replies You may post attachments You may edit your posts You may delete your posts HTML code is OFF BB Code is ON Smilies are ON

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. All other content is (c) 2001-2024 HarderFaster.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Text Mode